Comments on Job
I am a little surprised that the comments focus on the suffering, but ignore the critical issue, namely a human’s righteousness before God. Notice in 4:17 (Eliphaz: “Can a mortal be righteous before God?”) Eliphaz identifies the right question/issue behind the suffering The again in 5:8 Eliphaz the right solution (Eliphaz: “However, if I were you, I would appeal to God”)
Then even more clearly in 6:29-30 Job responds: “my righteousness is still the issue”
And in 7:21 (Job:) “Why not forgive my sin and pardon my iniquity?”
Again: (9:2 Job:) “Yes, I know what you’ve said is true, but how can a person be justified before God?”
Finally, in 9:33-35 Job admits:
“There is no mediator between us, to lay his hand on both of us. Let him take his rod away from me so his terror will no longer frighten me. Then I would speak and not fear him. But that is not the case; I am on my own.”
So suffering is certainly an issue, but behind it is the righteousness of the one who suffers. Ultimately that is resolved in chapters 38-42, most pointedly in God’s questioning of Job. Even after ch. 38-39, Job still does not get it. God ultimately asks:
Would you really challenge my justice?
Would you declare me guilty to justify yourself? (40: 8)
For such a critical issue, it seems that the comments could lead the reader to at least watch for something so significant.